rheomode

…………………………the research base of jon goodbun

Mud and Modernity, in Arena Journal for Architectural Research

What is concrete? Loved and loathed in equal measure, this building material, as soon as we try to define it, to specify it, to describe it, becomes, well, not very concrete at all, but rather fluid and surprisingly abstract! Concrete is a material which has been going through an interesting intellectual and practical renaissance in recent years, in no small part driven by the convergence of several different kinds of technology-driven manufacturing changes – ranging from computer aided manufacturing of formworks, to photograph etching, to engineering software, to nano- and bio-chemistry to 3D printing – which have opened up new worlds of realizable, expressive and performance optimised form. The demands posed by anthropogenic climate change, energy use, resource scarcity, and the environmental question more generally, have equally transformed the technologies and industries that are now feeding into developments in this material. On its own though, that is not enough to understand the revival in interest. In this paper I will argue that there are indeed profound relationships between capital, modernity and concrete. However, I will suggest that in order to really start to grasp these relations, we will need to explore some ways of thinking about concrete that have not been developed so far within the recent literature on the material. Notably I will develop an ecological approach to thinking about what concrete is, and in so doing redefine this material as a particular form of mud, or mudcrete: a material which is deployed by both human and non-human builders. I will note the ecological energetics and extended materialities of mudcrete, and will reflect upon the conceptual ‘forms’ or ‘patterns’ of this matter as a particular modality of the production of nature. Mudcretes always internalise in particularly interesting ways I argue, their external relations, the extended networks of materials, skills, labours and energies that go into their production. Mudcretes frequently stage fascinating bio-semiotic performances, whichever species or processes are dominant. But when the mudcretes in question are the product of human labour, they always act as social media.

Full article available here: http://ajar.arena-architecture.eu/articles/10.5334/ajar.6/

Filed under: ecology, research, teaching

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Info

Twitter Feed @jongoodbun

  • To win this election Labour needs to explain the advantages of its soft Brexit proposal more, and Labour remainers… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 14 hours ago
  • RT @n_srnck: Organised canvassing will be key on election day to getting Labour in power - you can help by visiting this site and saying wh… 16 hours ago
  • RT @jeremycorbyn: The people telling you we can't solve the climate crisis helped create it. The people telling you they won't sell off ou… 16 hours ago
  • RT @Ecocene: Please excuse the temporary partisan tweets and use these images with any undecided voters who care about these issues...pensi… 16 hours ago
  • RT @butwhatifitsall: #LeadershipDebate points missed (or deliberately avoided by Johnson): we don’t know all the facts about this case yet,… 16 hours ago
  • unbelievable @SkyNews talking about Russia influencing election through NHS report... yet BARELY EVEN MENTIONS THE UNPUBLISHED RUSSIA REPORT 20 hours ago
  • RT @paulmasonnews: There's a progressive majority in Britain - but unless we vote tactically we're going to see a bunch of super-rich racis… 20 hours ago
%d bloggers like this: